the truth about
local representation

The issue of land use control stands as a focal point for those advocating for incorporation, yet a realistic examination of recent legislative actions in Utah suggests a divergence from the fantastical expectations of the pro-incorporation group. Notably, Utah state law reveals a staunch pro-property rights stance, shedding light on the intricacies of real-life implications.

​

Recent legislative sessions underscore the state's inclination toward upzoning laws, primarily driven by the pressing need for affordable housing. Notably, in response to Park City's attempt to prohibit fractional ownership in residential areas, the state passed a law permitting such arrangements in any city across Utah. Another significant development is the Affordable or Low-Income Housing Act, compelling cities and counties to facilitate low-income housing construction. However, the exclusion of unincorporated areas and townships from this mandate is indicative of the perception that such regions are unsuitable for low-income housing, being deemed rural.

​

 We are not an island and we can't shut the gates. 

​

In essence, the dream of Ogden Valley as an isolated entity appears unattainable, grounded in a false narrative with flawed logic. While zoning changes are possible, they must align with state law, and the community's history of emotional resistance without viable alternatives will lead to legal battles. It's essential that our community engage in planning with experienced, professional planners to navigate the complex landscape of property rights and land use in the Valley to ensure we keep our rural heritage.